The following is an article written by pastor Darrell W. Sparks of the Dearborn Baptist Church in Aurora, IN. It will be presented in two posts. The second will appear a week from today.
The Charismatic Movement is making a comeback.
Not that it ever went away. The “wild” Charismatics continue to thrive on TBN. Just look at the size of their crowds and their financial statements; which can be difficult to ascertain (Check out ministrywatch.com). I suppose that there are certain personality types that are enamored with and in a constant search for intense emotional experiences and “feelings” and are, therefore, attracted to those denominations, those ministries, and those “preachers” who promote such. Signs and wonders, tongues and healings, it seems, cater to that personality type.
Many people are able to see through the shallowness and emotionalism of that type of Charismatic. Perhaps they have been alerted and alarmed by the moral and financial scandals connected with some of the high profile Charismatic ministries or have seen those exposes’ revealing that many of the so-called signs and wonders were bogus or that the lifestyles of the leaders are lavish. Maybe they have observed the false teaching of those preachers with regard to other doctrines (i.e. prosperity theology; eternal security).
It seems to me that the TBN kind of Charismatic is largely ignored by most conservative evangelical and fundamentalist Christians.
But there is a new kind of Charismatic - one that is more thoughtful and more theological, and therefore, in some ways more threatening. Rather than simply saying, “I don’t care what the Bible says, this is what happened to me” this kind of Charismatic does indeed care a great deal about what the Bible says and seeks to build a sound exegetical argument to support his view of the Charismatic gifts. In fact, he may even wince at the label Charismatic and prefer to call himself a “continuationist” as opposed to a “cessationist” when it comes to the supernatural sign gifts. (He may even be a “Baptist” by affiliation i.e. John Piper and Wayne Grudem).
This article is my attempt to re-visit what the Bible says specifically about the gift of tongues, to ascertain if indeed this gift is applicable the work of the Spirit in this present age.
"Tongues...shall cease..." (1 Corinthians 13:8)
In 1 Corinthians 13:8-13, the apostle Paul makes a contrast between the permanency of love and the temporary nature of some spiritual gifts. He writes, "Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away." Prophecies shall fail; tongues shall cease; knowledge shall vanish away. These three supernatural gifts, Paul explains, at some point in time shall be abolished. There is no denial that at some point in time the gift of tongues shall cease to exist. The Bible is crystal clear on this. It is a point that cannot be argued.
The verb that is used to describe what will happen to both prophecies and to knowledge is the exact same word in Greek. Strong’s Dictionary defines this Greek word as “to render entirely useless.” Vines explains (Vines Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, 1996) that this Greek word means that “they were to be rendered of no effect after their temporary use was fulfilled.” The word is found in twenty-six verses of the New Testament and is translated in the Authorized Version with the words “abolish, cease, cumber, deliver, destroy, do away, become (make) of no (none, without) effect, fail, loose, bring (come) to nought, put away (down), vanish away, and make void.” In 1 Corinthians Paul uses this same word (translated “put away”) to describe what a mature man does with his childish things. In Romans 7:2-6, Paul uses this word (translated “loosed” in verse 2 and “delivered” in verse 6) to describe what death does to a marriage relationship (a widow is loosed from the law of her dead husband) as an analogy of what Christ has done for us in relation to the Old Testament law.
Paul uses a different verb to describe the future end of tongues. He writes that they “shall cease.” Again, Strong’s Concordance defines this verb as “restrain, quit, desist, and come to an end.”
There is a sense in which these two verbs are used as synonyms in this text, that is, Paul uses two different verbs to express the same idea – a common literary device in writing. To paraphrase: Prophecies shall stop; tongues shall desist; knowledge shall stop. The two verbs are used synonymously.
But there is also a subtle distinction between the two verbs. The first verb (describing the cessation of prophecy and knowledge) is in the passive voice indicating that it will happen as the direct result of some person or action. Someone or something will cause the gifts of prophecy and knowledge to stop. The second verb (describing the cessation of tongues) is in the middle voice meaning that it will happen on its own. (To illustrate: An alarm stops when someone turns it off [passive voice] while a wind-up clock stops when it runs down on its own [middle voice]).
Again, there is no debate that these gifts will at some point no longer be in effect. The only question is when this will happen. There is a significant clue in the text. Verse 9 states that both knowledge and prophecies are “in part.” They are imperfect, partial, and incomplete. Verse 10 continues by explaining that these partial gifts will be “done away” (the exact same verb in the passive voice used to describe them in verse 8) when “that which is perfect is come.” Thus, the action that will cause these partial gifts (prophecy and knowledge) to stop will be the arrival of that which is perfect. Implied is that by then the gift of tongues will already have ceased on its own.
The question is then, to what does “that which is perfect” refer? What does Paul mean by that phrase? Some say that this phrase refers to the Lord Jesus Himself. Jesus is that which is perfect and when He comes, these gifts will cease. The problem with that interpretation is that Jesus is never referred to by a neuter pronoun. If Paul were speaking of Jesus, he would have written the Greek equivalent of "When He who is perfect is come."
There are others who say, "Well, it may not be a reference to Jesus, but it is a reference to the event, the Second Coming of Christ." The problem with that interpretation is contextual. There is absolutely no indication by the context that a reference to the Second Coming is intended. Paul is not writing about the Second Coming here; he is writing about the temporary nature of some spiritual gifts.
If you want to know the meaning of "that which is perfect" consider the illustration Paul uses in verse 12. "For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face." The word for glass refers, not to a window, but to a mirror, a looking glass. In the ancient world mirrors were made, not from glass like we are familiar with now, but from highly polished pieces of metal. In fact, the city of
II Corinthians also uses the words "glass" and "face" together. “But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.” The born-again, Spirit indwelled Christian has the privilege of looking into the word of God with an open mind and seeing a perfect reflection of Christ and thus, that Christian is changed from one level of glory to another by Spirit.
When we get to heaven, “then” we will see Christ, not through a mirror at all – either imperfect (through supernatural sign gifts) or perfect (through the completed canon of Scripture) – but “then face to face.” Presently, we know all that we need to know, all that God has revealed to us, but we do not know all that we will know. Presently, even with a perfect mirror, our ability to know Christ is limited by our own fallen humanness. “Then” – that is, once we have experienced glorification, we will know Christ as He knows us!
"That which is perfect" refers to the completion of the Word of God. These gifts awaited the coming of the complete canon of Scripture. And when the Word of God is complete, Paul writes, prophecy and knowledge will disappear and tongues will already be gone.
There were some people in the church during the first century who were gifted by the Holy Spirit with the ability to speak the Word of God directly from heaven. They were prophets, in the purest sense of the word. They spoke by revelation and said, "Thus saith the Lord." This was necessary because the written revelation was not complete. Preachers could not say, "Turn to Romans Chapter 12" because the book of Romans had not yet been written by Paul and was not in their Scriptures yet. Others, during that same time period had the gift of knowledge or the word of knowledge as it is sometimes called. These were apostles and their immediate associates to whom the Spirit had given the ability to write down the literal Word of God. The gift of knowledge was the supernatural inspiration of the Holy Spirit so that God's Word would be written. But when the complete canon of Scripture was fully revealed, these partial and temporary gifts were abolished. In the strict sense, there are no prophets today, and there is no gift of knowledge given to enable men to write Scripture. God’s revelation is complete and is limited to what is contained in Scripture. The last paragraph of the Bible, Revelation , says that the Scripture is complete. It reads in part, "If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book."
Thus, there is solid exegetical evidence in this text to indicate that these supernatural signs gifts either will stop – as in the case of prophecy and knowledge - or already will have ceased to exist – as in the case of tongues - when God closes the canon Scripture.
Furthermore, there is solid Biblical and historical evidence to back up this exegetical claim I am making about 1 Corinthians 13:8ff.
Biblically, 1 Corinthians is an early epistle of Paul. The last recorded miracle in the New Testament occurred around A.D. 58, with the healings on the
The evidence of Christian history also indicates that tongues have ceased. Early Christian theologians considered tongues obsolete. In a few, rare instances when tongues were spoken (Shakers, for example), those who practiced them were regarded as heretics.
The subject of speaking in tongues has only re-appeared during modern days. At the turn of the 20th century, in a church on
The Bible says that “tongues … shall cease.” Both the Bible and Christian history indicate that tongues have ceased.